This website is intended for Medical Professionals only. By using this site you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

News
Recurrent miscarriage: diabetes drug could ... An existing drug can be used to improve the womb for pregnancy, ... (08 Jan 2020)
Nerve Stimulation May Benefit Women with ... A treatment involving electrical nerve stimulation helped women ... (08 Jan 2020)
Cancer drugs could potentially treat COPD, ... New research from the University of Sheffield shows a certain ... (08 Jan 2020)
Tea drinkers live longer Drinking tea at least three times a week is linked with a longer ... (08 Jan 2020)

Study Questions Effectiveness of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems

An analysis of the use of computerized clinical decision support systems regarding orders for advanced diagnostic imaging found that the systems failed to identify relevant appropriateness criteria for the majority of orders, according to a study in JAMA.
Computerized clinical decision support (CDS) systems that match patient characteristics against appropriateness criteria to produce algorithmic treatment recommendations are a potential means of improving care. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 mandates use of CDS systems for the ordering of advanced diagnostic imaging in the Medicare program starting in 2017, according to background information in the article.
Peter S. Hussey, Ph.D., of RAND, Boston, and colleagues used data from the Medicare Imaging Demonstration to evaluate the relationship of CDS system use with the appropriateness of ordered images. Between October 2011 and November 2013, clinicians used computerized radiology order entry systems and CDS systems for selected magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and nuclear medicine procedures. During a 6-month baseline period, the CDS systems tracked whether orders were linked with appropriateness criteria but did not provide clinicians with feedback on appropriateness of orders.
During the 18-month intervention period, the CDS systems provided feedback indicating whether the order was linked to appropriateness criteria and, if so, the appropriateness rating, any recommendations for alternative orders, and a link to documentation supporting each rating. National medical specialty societies developed the appropriateness criteria using expert panels that reviewed evidence and completed a structured rating process.
The 3,340 participating clinicians placed 117,348 orders for advanced diagnostic imaging procedures. The CDS systems did not identify relevant appropriateness criteria for 63.3 percent of orders during the baseline period and for 66.5 percent during the intervention period. During the baseline period, 11.1 percent of final rated orders were inappropriate vs 6.4 percent during the intervention period. During the baseline period, 73.7 percent of final rated orders were appropriate vs 81.0 percent during the intervention period. Of orders initially rated as inappropriate, 4.8 percent were changed and 1.9 percent were canceled.
“Most orders were unable to be matched by the CDS systems to appropriateness criteria. Of those matched, there was a small increase in the percentage of orders rated appropriate between the baseline and intervention periods, although few inappropriate orders were changed or canceled immediately following feedback from the CDS systems. Therefore, improvements in appropriate imaging ordering do not appear related to immediate feedback and instead may be related to physician learning or secular changes,” the authors write.

“Implementing CDS systems in real-world settings has many challenges that must be addressed to meaningfully affect patient care.”


Source Newsroom: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Citations
JAMA

Highlights

  • Give a Gift this Christmas which gives back

    The story of medicine is the story of civilization, from an ancient craft of primitive magic and religion to the sophisticated field of science and technology of today.

    Read more...
  • Nescafé 3 in1 LifeCycle HEROES return from South Asia

    Donations for Nescafé 3in1 LifeCycle Challenge 2019 can be sent via sms: 5061 7370 = €2.33; 5061 8920 = €6.99; 5061 9229 = €11.65; or via a call to 5160 2020 = €10, 5170 2005 = €15; and 5180 2006 = €25. Bank details are Swift code VALLMTMT, IBAN number MT 18 VALL 22013000000014814521017, Bank name Bank of Valletta, Account number 14814521017.

    Read more...

Join

Connect with other Medical Professionals on fb in a closed facebook group

Login

Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…